Makeup Review: Covergirl Lash Blast Vs. Rimmel London Glam'Eyes
8:02 PM Posted In covergirl lash blast , makeup , mascara , rimmel london glam'eyes Edit This 1 Comment »
OK For all those who don't know. I have very fine, almost non-existent eyelashes. Fake lashes were made for folks like me. Unfortunately for me, I am horrible with fake eyelashes, so I rely heavily on mascara for daily makeup use. Now both of these mascaras were supposed to plump up my eyelashes, something I desperately needed, since without mascara, I look like I have no eyelashes.

The first product I tried was the Covergirl Lash Blast. I put it on, and it worked as a mascara, but I didn't notice any big difference between that and my regular mascara I use. Before purchasing Lash Blast, I was using E.L.F. Earth and Water duo mascara. It worked ok, but honestly, it was a $1, I don't expect much. Plus for some reason the mascara on the "water" side always seems to dry up. Of course, it is a $1, what do I expect? The problem with Covergirl Lash Blast is that I paid more than a dollar for it. I paid over $8 for it. Like I said, it worked ok, but considering it was supposed to give me long, lush, lashes, I expected more. One positive is that it is waterproof, but other than that, not really the best mascara I have ever used.

Next is Rimmel London Glam'Eyes. This stuff is truth. I swear it looked like I had some full thick lashes!! The best part about this is I spent less than $5 on this mascara and the tube is cute as all get out. It is pink and black with a little fishnet design. The only downside to this, it this mascara is not waterproof.
All in all Rimmel is the best of the two I tried, if you actually have lashes the Covergirl might suffice, but for those of us with invisible lashes, Rimmel is the way to go.

The first product I tried was the Covergirl Lash Blast. I put it on, and it worked as a mascara, but I didn't notice any big difference between that and my regular mascara I use. Before purchasing Lash Blast, I was using E.L.F. Earth and Water duo mascara. It worked ok, but honestly, it was a $1, I don't expect much. Plus for some reason the mascara on the "water" side always seems to dry up. Of course, it is a $1, what do I expect? The problem with Covergirl Lash Blast is that I paid more than a dollar for it. I paid over $8 for it. Like I said, it worked ok, but considering it was supposed to give me long, lush, lashes, I expected more. One positive is that it is waterproof, but other than that, not really the best mascara I have ever used.

Next is Rimmel London Glam'Eyes. This stuff is truth. I swear it looked like I had some full thick lashes!! The best part about this is I spent less than $5 on this mascara and the tube is cute as all get out. It is pink and black with a little fishnet design. The only downside to this, it this mascara is not waterproof.
All in all Rimmel is the best of the two I tried, if you actually have lashes the Covergirl might suffice, but for those of us with invisible lashes, Rimmel is the way to go.



1 comments:
Ok...You've convinced me....Putting this on my Walgreens list for tonite when I get offa work...This is going with me on vacation!
Post a Comment